Saturday, November 08, 2003
"What you mean 'we', white man?"
Domenico Bettinelli reports that Bishop Barbara Harris thinks the Freedom Rides are back in town:
"This is a power struggle as to who is going to run the church, the white boys who have always run it, or some different kinds of people. White men see their church being changed and they don't like it."
(reported in the Guardian)
Let's reality check this:

Nope, definately not a white boy.
Let's see about those "different kinds of people" challenging the "white boys":
Not a white boy:

Not a white boy:

Not a white boy:

Um, whatever ... now that we've taken a look at those challenging the dread grip of White Boys™ on the life of the Anglican communion, let's take a look at those who "see their church being changed and they don't like it."
White boy:

White boy:

White boy:

Does anyone know a good opthamologist in the Washington, D.C. area? It would appear that Bishop Harris needs to have her eyes examined. She's clearly not color-blind, but suffering from some odd inversion of color perception.
Here there cannot be Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free man, but Christ is all, and in all.
-- Colossians 3:11 (RSV)
But never mind what that old homophobe St. Paul had to say. According to Barbara Harris, we can still have white and non-white. You go, sister! Don't let those white boys in America push your brothers in Africa and the rest of the Third World around! "Different kinds of people" Power!
Labels: Episcopal Church
Tuesday, November 04, 2003
The Floggings Will Continue Until Celebration of Diversity Is Achieved
...my private anger at Episcopalian fundamentalists...
Somebody should clue in Rev. Harry that he's departing from the script.
It's the "fundamentalists" who are supposed to be angry. The revisionists -- sorry, those who are "learning to live the mystery of communion at a deeper level" -- are supposed to be merely saddened and mystified at such irrational displays.
He also let slip the following --
... the church decided to stop discussing, take a stand and make a statement.
No more dialogue for you Neanderthal fundamentalists! We've been patient with you, and you didn't even have the decency to shut up. "Now I shall have to be vewy angwy."
Shouldn't the presiding bishop remind Rev. Cook about all his statements that GC2003 didn't end the discussion about human sexuality in the ECUSA? Who to believe, who to believe?
Labels: Episcopal Church